• AP Magazine

    An alternative way to explore and explain the mysteries of our world. "Published since 1985, online since 2001."

  • 1
Archaeotrek—Alternate Perceptions Magazine, January 2016


by: Jason Jarrell and Sarah Farmer

In the 1800s, reports began to surface of the discovery of very large skeletal remains in the burial mounds of North America. During this period, Antiquarians and Historians from multiple townships and counties chronicled the unearthing of skeletons reaching 7-8 feet in length (with a lower frequency of discoveries spanning 9-11 ft in length), described as having very large skulls and gigantic lower jawbones.

“It was a mound about thirteen feet high….the diameter of its base was about fifty feet…Portions of the skeletons were in a good state of preservation. The femur, or thigh bone, of one of the males, which Dr. Bonine has now in his possession, is of great size and indicates that its owner must have been at least seven feet in height”1

“A recent exploration of a mound near this place resulted in some interesting discoveries…The form was large, the jaws massive, and the teeth perfect.”2

“Bridge Carpenters on the N. & W. R. R. found a gigantic skeleton while excavating, three miles east of Portsmouth, a few days ago. The skeleton measured, 7 feet, 4 inches…”3

In the 1880s, the Eastern Mound Division of the Smithsonian discovered a number of gigantic skeletons in their wanton destruction of North American tumuli:

“Near the original surface (of the mound)…lying at full length upon its back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered by the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual measurement being between 7 and 8 feet.”4

“In the center (of mound 11), 3 feet below the surface, was a vault 8 feet long and 3 feet wide. In the bottom of this…lay a skeleton fully 7 feet long…”4

The twentieth century saw the rediscovery of the ancient giants by mainstream archeologists. Working with Charles Snow, William S Webb (University of Kentucky) positively identified the unique skeletal features noted by the early sources with the people of the Adena Mound Building Culture:

“The forehead is typically a prominent one, bordered below by fairly prominent brow ridges….The characteristic bulge of the upper and lower jaws (alveolar prognathism) is moderate in projection…Usually the cheek bones are not only of large size in themselves but they have a forward and lateral prominence…”

Webb, Snow and Baby also described the “great width of the bony chin, formed by bilateral eminences”. 5

The large Adena crania were extremely high vaulted (brachycephalic):

“Approximately 89% of the adult males, 92% of the adult females are brachycephalic.” 6

Webb and Snow considered the Adena crania to represent the “highest skull vaults reported anywhere in the world” 7 with a cephalic index ranging from 89 to 100. 5

The Adena People practiced artificial flattening of the occipital region, which added height to the cranial vault. According to Webb and Snow, this practice merely enhanced congenital features:

“…those skulls with slight or no deformation (undeformed) present similar proportions”.6

“It is likely that many, if not most, of the skull characteristics so typical of Adena are of genetic nature…”5

At the Dover Mound in Mason County, Kentucky, Webb encountered a 7 ft tall skeleton with these notable Adena features (burial 40): “…the remains of burial 40 is one of the largest known to Adena; the skull-foot field measurement is 84 inches (7 feet).”7

In1958, Don Dragoo (of the Carnegie Museum) uncovered the remains of an individual “of large proportions” in a subsurface tomb at the lowest strata of the Cresap Mound in West Virginia. Burial 54 as described by Dragoo:

“When measured in the tomb his length was approximately 7.04 feet. All the long bones were heavy and possessed marked eminences for the attachment of muscles.”8

Dragoo described the unique traits of Adena, including the “protruding and massive chin” with “prominent bilateral protrusions”, as well as “individuals approaching seven feet in height”. 8

It is important to note that in considering this information from Webb, Snow, and Dragoo, regularly occurring gigantic members are not the only unique features of the Adena People.


“Not only were these Adena People tall but also the massiveness of the bones indicates powerfully built individuals. The head was generally big with a large cranial capacity.” 8

Working in the 20th century, Webb, Snow and Dragoo essentially corroborated the findings of the earlier antiquarians and linked the gigantic skeletal types with a specific culture. Following this, the pioneering research of Ross Hamilton and the late Vine Deloria set a scholarly standard for giantology, synchronizing the Native and Archeological records (as outlined in Hamilton’s unsurpassed work, A Tradition of Giants). 9 More recently, Dr Greg Little (Path of Souls) has published research disproving several often used conventional explanations for the very large skeletons found in Adena mounds (such as the 7 ft tall basketball player analogy) with mathematical precision. 10

And yet, in spite of this tradition of rediscovery no satisfactory reconstruction of an Adena giant has ever been undertaken. While we are routinely reminded of the dimensions of the giants in volumes reprinting multiple hundreds of accounts of their discovery, we have been denied imagery representing their living form. While numerous other anomalies (such as the Paracas and “Starchild” crania) have received due attention, the gigantic Adena have remained shrouded in mystery. In May of 2015, the authors undertook a joint venture with the legendary Marcia K Moore to remedy this situation.

Marcia is best known as the premier artist recreating the living images of the elongated crania of Peru, associated with the Paracas People. Her work has appeared in the books of Brien Foerster and L.A. Marzulli and has been featured on the Ancient Aliens TV series, with Marcia herself occasionally appearing on the show. 11

The skull used for the Adena recreation was that of burial 16 from the Wright Mounds in Kentucky (photographed in figure 25 of The Adena People No1), which is described as showing “pronounced” deformation.6 According to H.T.E. Hertzberg, the crania of the Wright site featured the large, prognathic lower mandibles typical of Adena, and although artificially deformed, the series demonstrated the large congenital features later noted by Webb, Snow and Dragoo:

“…deformed as they are, these crania display a pronounced brachycrany…it may be noticed that four skulls…displaying submedium deformation, also give an average cranial index of over 90%. Thus the inference is that these people would have shown pronounced brachycrany even without deformation…”12

The dimensions of the Adena giant were derived from several sources with corroborating details, including the hand written field notebook of P. W. Norris, the agent of the Bureau of Ethnology who excavated the Adena mounds at Charleston, W.V. in 1883 and 1884. Several mounds at Charleston yielded skeletons 7 ft long. At the Great Smith Mound, Norris encountered a house like timber structure 12 x 13 feet broad and 6 feet high, reaching 10 feet at the ridged top. Within this structure was a “gigantic and prominent personage, surrounded by 5 of his (probably volunteer) warriors…” Norris measured the central burial in situ and described it as “a gigantic human skeleton 7 feet 6 inches in length and 19 inches between the shoulders…” Elsewhere in the manuscript, this skeleton is regularly referred to as “the giant” or “gigantic"12. The measurements provided by Norris are similar to those from several other sources:

“Six feet above these remains was found the partial skeleton of a man almost a giant in size….The breadth across the shoulders, with the bones correctly placed, was nineteen inches…”14

“The length from the base of the skull to the bones of the toes was found to be 7 feet 3 inches. It is probable, therefore, that this individual when living was 7.5 feet high.”4

These anthropological details corroborate Norris’ account and indicate individuals approaching 8 feet tall. Since a high frequency of reports describe skeletons reaching this height, the data was used by Marcia to formulate the likely dimensions and appearance of an 8 ft tall Adena in the flesh.

Marcia has done more than merely provide a visual for a tall member of a prehistoric population. The Adena giant represents a truly unique form of humankind, which until now has only been suggested by the multitude of Newspaper and Historical accounts regularly reprinted in the giantology market place. The recreation of a very large member of Webb, Snow and Dragoo’s “unique group of honored dead” provides a glimpse into the distant past, a snapshot from beyond the veil pulled over history by the establishment a century ago.

Marcia is currently working with the authors on a book to be published in 2016 that will feature an extensive set of her recreations of Adena and Adena-like individuals from the burial mounds of North America and around the world. This important visual work will accompany the presentation of 7000 years of obfuscated world history.

Authors’ website:

Marcia K Moore:


1. Alfred Matthews. History of Cass County, Michigan.
2. American Antiquarian, 1879.
3. The News-Herald, January 3rd, 1895.
4. 12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology.
5. Webb, Snow and Baby, The Adena People No 2.
6. Webb and Snow. The Adena People.
7. William S Webb. The Dover Mound.
8. Don W Dragoo. Mounds for the Dead.
9. Ross Hamilton. A Tradition of Giants.
10. Greg Little. The Truth about Giant Skeletons in North American Indian Mounds and the Smithsonian Cover-up. Ap Magazine 6/28/2014.
11. Ancient Aliens: Alien Evolution.
12. H.T.E. Hertzberg. Skeletal Material from the Wright Site, Montgomery County, Kentucky.
13. Norris Mound Excavations. Manuscript on file, Smithsonian Institution.
14. Warren K Moorehead. Primitive Man in Ohio.

Wednesday, December 06, 2023